惠普 EliteBook 1040 G10 笔记本电脑评测--惠普对 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 的回应镁合金外壳和 LTE。 EliteBook 1040 G10 是惠普的商务旗舰产品，也是联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 的直接竞争对手。不过，英特尔目前的酷睿 i5 处理器性能并不突出，我们测试机的显示屏也没有达到制造商规定的数值。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/09/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇸🇪 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇷🇺 Business Intel Evo Raptor Lake Ultrabook Windows
EliteBook 1040 G10 是惠普的商务旗舰产品。就价格而言，它的定位甚至高于 EliteBook 845 G10的价格。因此，它的直接竞争对手是联想的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11的直接竞争对手。惠普为其高端笔记本电脑配备了丰富的安全功能和镁合金外壳。此外，英特尔当前的 U 或 P 系列 CPU 还有许多不同的配置选项。
我们的测试机售价 1669 欧元（约合 1785 美元），是最经济实惠的 EliteBook 1040 G10 版本之一。它配备了 400 尼特的低功耗 1080p 显示屏、一个 酷睿 i5-1335U16GB内存、512GB固态硬盘和LTE调制解调器。在惠普的校园计划中，该版本的售价已经达到 1379 欧元（约合 1475 美元）。
Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA (EliteBook 1040 Series)ProcessorIntel Core i5-1335U 10 x 0.9 - 4.6 GHz, 52 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-UGraphics adapterIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsMemory16 GB , DDR5-5200, dual-channel, 2/2 slots in use, max. 64 GBDisplay14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, CMN1435, IPS, glossy: no, 60 HzMainboardIntel Alder Lake-P PCHStorageSamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, 512 GB , 415 GB freeSoundcardIntel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVSConnections2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB4 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 316 x 224Battery51 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 ProCameraWebcam: 5 MP + IRPrimary Camera: 5 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 4 speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W USB-C PSU, 36 Months WarrantyWeight1.3 kg, Power Supply: 301 g
Price1669 EuroLinksHP homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice
88.4 %v7 (old)09 / 2023HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAi5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs1.3 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
90.1 %v7 (old)08 / 2023HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAR9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M1.5 kg17.9 mm14.00"2560x1600
88.9 %v7 (old)06 / 2023Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs1.2 kg15.36 mm14.00"1920x1200
89.6 %v7 (old)06 / 2023Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs1.3 kg15.6 mm14.20"3120x2080
88.8 %v7 (old)10 / 2022SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Tii7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU1.3 kg16.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
外壳 - 配备镁合金外壳的 EliteBookEliteBook 1040 G10 的基本设计与其他 EliteBook（如 845 G10等其他 EliteBook 并无不同。银色的笔记本看起来很优雅，黑色的键盘和深色的显示屏边框形成了很好的对比。尤其是侧面，显示屏边框小得令人舒适，尽管顶部和底部略宽，但没有像其他几款商务竞争产品那样出现摄像头凸起。与 EliteBook 845 G10 的铝制外壳相比，其表面粗糙度很小，温度也略高。但指纹和灰尘在这里也不是大问题。
稳定性非常好，底座和显示屏盖都非常坚硬，不易变形。在直接对比中，我们看不出与 EliteBook 845 G10 有什么不同，因此显示器盖子在合上时也可以按进去。不过，即使我们用很大的力气，仍然无法激起显示屏的任何反应。最大开启角度约为 170 度，中央铰链调节良好。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
1040 G10 的表壳宽度略小于 845 G10，但深度略大于 845 G10。两个型号的高度相同。但镁合金外壳对重量有积极影响，重量正好是 1.3 千克（约 2.87 磅），比 845 G10 轻约 160 克（约 5.6 盎司）。重量ThinkPad X1 Carbon采用了相同的占地面积，但机身略微纤薄，重量也更轻。附带的充电器几乎又增加了 300 克（约 10.6 盎司）的重量。该笔记本电脑还可选配容量较小的 38 瓦时电池，这样可以减轻约 100 克（约 3.5 盎司）的重量。
尺寸比较
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti DIN A4 ❌
设备 - 雷电 4 和 Wi-Fi 6EEliteBook 1040 G10 的大部分接口都位于机身左侧。两个 USB-C 接口支持 Thunderbolt 4，因此也可用于连接扩展坞。作为一款商务笔记本电脑，该设备还提供一个智能卡读卡器，但没有 SD 卡读卡器。
HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s）、2x USB-C 4.0（带 Thunderbolt 4，40 Gbit/s）、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4、Power Delivery、智能卡读卡器
Nano-SIM 卡插槽、Nano 安全锁、USB 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s，充电）、3.5 毫米音频交流4G/LTE 调制解调器（也可选择 5G）EliteBook 1040 G10 配备了英特尔（Intel）的现代无线局域网模块（AX211），还支持现代 6 GHz 网络（Wi-Fi 6E）和蓝牙 5.3。在使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中，传输速率非常高，在测试期间的正常使用（包括一些大型下载）中也完全没有问题。
我们的测试机配备了 Fibocom 的 WWAN 模块（860-GL-16），用于 4G/LTE 连接。除了 Nano-SIM 卡，您还可以使用 eSIM 卡，此外，EliteBook 还可以选配英特尔的 5G 模块。
NetworkingHP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1635 (min: 1507) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1662 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARealtek 8852CE iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1820 (min: 1772) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1749 (min: 1715) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1614 (min: 1552) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1533 (min: 1412) MBit/s ∼92%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
591 (min: 549) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
938 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1353 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1682 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼96%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1458 (min: 1294) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1570 (min: 1446) MBit/s ∼94%
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1635 (1507-1724) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1662 (1627-1691)
网络摄像头显示屏边框的顶部边缘装有一个 500 万像素摄像头，可记录清晰的图像，还包括一个机械快门。特别是在图像清晰度方面，与普通的 720p 或 1080p 机型相比有一些明显的优势，而且你也不需要外接网络摄像头就能获得良好的图像质量。此外，还配备了红外摄像头，可以通过 Windows Hello 进行人脸识别。
7.8 ∆E7.4 ∆E13.5 ∆E14.1 ∆E12.3 ∆E10.1 ∆E10.3 ∆E12.9 ∆E9.6 ∆E8.7 ∆E10.6 ∆E9.5 ∆E9.2 ∆E10.7 ∆E9.5 ∆E6.9 ∆E8.1 ∆E13.4 ∆E2.7 ∆E8 ∆E9.9 ∆E8.1 ∆E7.6 ∆E2.5 ∆EColorChecker HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA: 9.3 ∆E min: 2.54 - max: 14.06 ∆E
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA
维护除了几颗飞利浦螺钉外，机箱底部还有几个塑料卡扣，其中一些卡扣固定得非常紧。在机箱内部，你可以看到电池、风扇、两个通信模块、M.2 固态硬盘以及两个工作内存插槽。固态硬盘和内存有一个额外的盖子，但这只是一个插槽，可以轻松取下。总的来说，维护选项还是不错的。
内部结构
2x SO-DIMM
电池详细信息输入设备 - 惠普使用非常出色的键盘惠普使用的发光 Chiclet 键盘可提供非常舒适的输入体验。在 EliteBook 845 G10的键盘一样，键程非常精确，也不会太短。与ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 的键盘相比相比，EliteBook 845 G10 的键盘特性非常相似，但我们更喜欢 EliteBook 的键盘。键盘布局没有任何惊喜，只有右上角的方向键和集成电源按钮不太理想。指纹扫描仪位于键盘右下方。
输入设备
键盘照明惠普已经有一段时间没有在其业务模式中加入点读棒了，但 ClickPad 的使用效果非常好。它的尺寸为 12 x 8 厘米（约 4.7 x 3.1 英寸），足够大，而且滑动特性非常好。在测试过程中，我们没有遇到任何指针移动或手势（最多使用四个手指）方面的问题。您还可以点击键盘的下半部分，产生的低沉咔嗒声给人一种高品质的印象。
显示屏 - 低功耗显示屏不够亮子像素阵列
轻微光晕惠普为 EliteBook 提供了多种显示屏，从 250 尼特 IPS 显示屏到 1000 cd/m² 的 SureView 面板（包括集成的隐私滤镜），不过由于主观图像质量较差，我们并不推荐使用这种显示屏。我们的测试机使用的是哑光低功耗 FHD 面板（1,920 x 1,200 像素，16:10），标称亮度为 400 cd/m²。主观图像质量不错，因为显示的内容足够清晰，即使是明亮的内容也没有颗粒感，不过色彩还可以再鲜艳一些。亮度和色温均可通过传感器自动调节。
在我们的测量中，测试设备的亮度远远达不到宣传的 400 cd/m²，因为我们测量到的最高亮度为 343 cd/m²，平均亮度为 330 cd/m²。黑色值非常低，仅为 0.19 cd/m²，对比度为 1,800:1。光晕问题并不严重，我们也没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。不过，响应时间相当慢，我们还看到了一些移动时的重影效果。
338cd/m²334cd/m²328cd/m²341cd/m²343cd/m²321cd/m²331cd/m²320cd/m²317cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessCMN1435 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 330.3 cd/m² Minimum: 14.8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %Center on Battery: 344 cd/m²Contrast: 1805:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}calibrated: 0.7ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)88.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)67.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.14CCT: 7079 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EACMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAUO6DA8, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000B140UAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiMNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"Display27%12%22%9% Display P3 Coverage (%)67.798.3 45%75.4 11%89.8 33%74.1 9% sRGB Coverage (%)88.199.8 13%99.6 13%99.4 13%97.4 11% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)69.886.2 23%77.3 11%84.2 21%75.3 8%Response Times75%-34%70%46% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)54.8 ?(25.4, 29.4)12.7 ?(5.8, 7) 77%64.4 ?(30.7, 33.7) -18%20 ?(6, 14) 64%31.5 ?(14, 17.5) 43% Response Time Black / White * (ms)28.3 ?(13.2, 15.1)7.9 ?(4.1, 3.8) 72%42.5 ?(24.7, 17.8) -50%7 ?(2, 5) 75%14.5 ?(4.7, 9.8) 49% PWM Frequency (Hz)156000 ?(50)Screen10%-14%16%-19%Brightness middle (cd/m²)343546 59%379 10%595 73%421 23%Brightness (cd/m²)330564 71%383 16%550 67%416 26%Brightness Distribution (%)9286 -7%91 -1%85 -8%89 -3%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.190.38 -100%0.21 -11%0.25 -32%0.28 -47%Contrast (:1)18051437 -20%1805 0%2380 32%1504 -17%Colorchecker dE 2000 *31.3 57%3.2 -7%2.01 33%3.2 -7%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *75.3 24%7.3 -4%6.9 1%5.5 21%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.71.2 -71%1.7 -143%1.22 -74%2 -186%Greyscale dE 2000 *5.41.1 80%4.5 17%2.74 49%4.4 19%Gamma2.14 103%2.27 97%2.19 100%2.4 92%2.22 99%CCT7079 92%6463 101%6249 104%6319 103%6384 102%Total Average (Program / Settings)37% /
23%-12% /
-11%36% /
25%12% /
-4%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析后发现，色温略微偏冷，有轻微的蓝色色调。色彩方面也有一些偏差，但我们可以通过自己的校准（您可以从上面的链接免费下载配置文件）将色彩还原到参考水平，偏差极小。不过，sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率仅勉强达到 90%，因此竞争对手在这方面做得更好。虽然这款面板总体上还算适合办公室使用，但考虑到其高昂的价格，还是让人略感失望。
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White28.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise↘ 15.1 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey54.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.4 ms rise↘ 29.4 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
在阳光下
在树荫下
当然，哑光显示屏对室外也有好处，阴天也能舒适地在室外工作。不过，在晴天亮度不够。IPS 面板的可视角度稳定性很好，只是从上方侧面看亮度会有所提高。
视角稳定性性能 - Raptor Lake Core i5
测试条件惠普没有提供任何单独的电源配置文件，而是使用常规的 Windows 电源配置文件。我们使用最佳性能配置文件运行了以下基准测试和测量。
处理器我们测试的 EliteBook 1040 G10 配置配备了 酷睿 i5-1335U这是该机型最弱的处理器。它是当前 U 系列的 Raptor Lake 处理器，拥有两个性能核心和八个效率核心。尽管 U 系列的标称 TDP 为 15 瓦，但允许处理器的最大功耗高达 52 瓦。然而，这个值无法维持，并立即下降，过了很短的时间才降到 15 瓦。
与此相对应的是，只有在短时间负载的情况下才会有好的结果，而在持续负载的情况下性能会大幅下降。不过，单核性能还是不错的，对于日常办公任务来说，整体性能也不错--尽管竞争对手的整体速度更快。在电池工作状态下，最大功耗为 45 瓦，但几秒钟后功耗仅为 15 瓦。这导致多核性能下降约 26%，单核性能也受到影响（-10%）。您可以在 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA Intel Core i5-1335U: Ø917 (858.17-1529.34) HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Ø2330 (2299.38-2359.74) Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 Intel Core i7-1365U: Ø1275 (1095.95-1603.72) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1613 (1476.83-1993.62) SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1988 (1948.94-2166.26)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
79.8 pt SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
79.7 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
74.4 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
68.4 pt Average of class Office
63.2 pt Average Intel Core i5-1335U
57.7 pt HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
55.8 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
14919 Points +101%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
14917 Points +100%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
11571 Points +56%Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=81, last 2 years)
10330 Points +39%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
9343 Points +26%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (6957 - 9438, n=12)
8383 Points +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
7440 Points Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
1877 Points +11%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
1848 Points +9%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
1695 Points SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
1678 Points -1%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (1532 - 1733, n=12)
1669 Points -2%Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=81, last 2 years)
1604 Points -5%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1568 Points -7%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
5790 Points +98%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
5762 Points +97%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
4526 Points +55%Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=79, last 2 years)
4060 Points +39%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
3669 Points +26%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (2602 - 3849, n=11)
3257 Points +11%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
2922 Points Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
734 Points +13%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
719 Points +11%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
701 Points +8%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
647 Points Average Intel Core i5-1335U (593 - 663, n=11)
636 Points -2%Average of class Office (285 - 815, n=79, last 2 years)
629 Points -3%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
611 Points -6%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2360 (2299.38min - 2359.74max) Points +54%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
2166 (1948.94min - 2166.26max) Points +42%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
2008 Points +31%Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=83, last 2 years)
1695 Points +11%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
1604 (1095.95min - 1603.72max) Points +5%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
1529 (858.17min - 1529.34max) Points Average Intel Core i5-1335U (1109 - 1547, n=11)
1411 Points -8%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
268 Points +8%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
267 Points +8%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
263 Points +6%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
248 Points HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
247 Points 0%Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=81, last 2 years)
243 Points -2%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (222 - 248, n=11)
237 Points -4%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
515 Seconds * Average Intel Core i5-1335U (340 - 786, n=12)
460 Seconds * +11%Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=82, last 2 years)
388 Seconds * +25%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
373 Seconds * +28%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
295 Seconds * +43%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
262 Seconds * +49%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
215 Seconds * +58%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
61303 MIPS +110%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
50517 MIPS +73%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
45679 MIPS +57%Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=83, last 2 years)
41376 MIPS +42%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
39077 MIPS +34%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (25012 - 38513, n=11)
33576 MIPS +15%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
29159 MIPS 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
5941 MIPS +11%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
5844 MIPS +9%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
5833 MIPS +9%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
5717 MIPS +6%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
5376 MIPS Average of class Office (3046 - 6497, n=82, last 2 years)
5345 MIPS -1%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (4872 - 5545, n=11)
5202 MIPS -3%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
10976 Points +32%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
9897 Points +19%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
8909 Points +7%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
8709 Points +5%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
8318 Points Average of class Office (1532 - 14192, n=81, last 2 years)
8226 Points -1%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (5459 - 8618, n=11)
7429 Points -11%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
1938 Points +16%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
1792 Points +7%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
1778 Points +6%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1758 Points +5%Average of class Office (510 - 2128, n=82, last 2 years)
1685 Points +1%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
1673 Points Average Intel Core i5-1335U (1506 - 1700, n=11)
1639 Points -2%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
17 fps +160%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
13.8 fps +111%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
12.7 fps +94%Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=80, last 2 years)
11.6 fps +77%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
9.93 fps +52%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (6.55 - 10.7, n=11)
9.03 fps +38%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
6.55 fps LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=80, last 2 years)
56.2 s * -0%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
56 s * Average Intel Core i5-1335U (45 - 58.7, n=11)
51.6 s * +8%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
50.5 s * +10%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
46.3 s * +17%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
42.8 s * +24%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
40.3 s * +28%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=79, last 2 years)
0.538 sec * -7%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (0.4892 - 0.524, n=10)
0.51 sec * -1%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U
0.505 sec * HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
0.4835 sec * +4%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H
0.4587 sec * +9%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P
0.4578 sec * +9%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U
0.4504 sec * +11%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1529 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit94.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit248 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)2922 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)647 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core1695 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core7440 Points
Help... in comparison
Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
94.1 pt SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
66.7 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62.2 pt Average of class Office
57.3 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50.5 pt Average Intel Core i5-1335U
41.8 pt HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
38.6 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
24250 KRay/s +303%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12366 KRay/s +105%Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=81, last 2 years)
11611 KRay/s +93%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
9618 KRay/s +60%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8270 KRay/s +37%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (5661 - 7809, n=11)
6806 KRay/s +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6019 KRay/s AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
101262 Points +224%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
61721 Points +97%Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=81, last 2 years)
55000 Points +76%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48441 Points +55%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
40392 Points +29%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (29483 - 43636, n=11)
35448 Points +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
31290 Points AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
4418 MB/s +172%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2850 MB/s +75%Average of class Office (590 - 5398, n=81, last 2 years)
2615 MB/s +61%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2404 MB/s +48%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2216 MB/s +36%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (1515 - 2278, n=11)
1840 MB/s +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1624 MB/s AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
113016 Points +88%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91588 Points +52%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
89068 Points +48%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
68996 Points +15%Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=81, last 2 years)
68269 Points +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
60161 Points Average Intel Core i5-1335U (53839 - 60992, n=11)
59437 Points -1%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
14147 Points +228%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8278 Points +92%Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=81, last 2 years)
7222 Points +68%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6597 Points +53%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5125 Points +19%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (3873 - 5008, n=11)
4524 Points +5%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4308 Points AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
54003 Points +253%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
30137 Points +97%Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=81, last 2 years)
28821 Points +89%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23884 Points +56%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20366 Points +33%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (14376 - 20553, n=11)
17214 Points +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
15289 Points AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
87671 MB/s +165%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
76133 MB/s +130%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
69002 MB/s +108%Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=81, last 2 years)
50334 MB/s +52%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41228 MB/s +24%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (31154 - 65997, n=11)
39412 MB/s +19%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33118 MB/s AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
987 MB/s +161%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
962 MB/s +154%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
686 MB/s +81%Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=81, last 2 years)
674 MB/s +78%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
650 MB/s +72%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (378 - 676, n=11)
552 MB/s +46%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
378 MB/s AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
12755 KRay/s +302%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6587 KRay/s +107%Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=81, last 2 years)
6145 KRay/s +94%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5193 KRay/s +64%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4367 KRay/s +38%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (2878 - 4214, n=11)
3589 KRay/s +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3175 KRay/s AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44535 MPixel/s +25%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
43780 MPixel/s +23%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
35658 MPixel/s Average of class Office (9310 - 55359, n=81, last 2 years)
32339 MPixel/s -9%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (13584 - 41123, n=11)
30316 MPixel/s -15%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
29949 MPixel/s -16%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
24030 MPixel/s -33%
系统性能由于采用了现代处理器和 NVMe 固态硬盘，EliteBook 1040 G10 给人的主观性能印象非常好，在执行所有输入时都不会出现任何明显的延迟。在合成基准测试中，我们会发现它只使用了酷睿 i5 处理器，而大多数竞争对手都能取得稍好的成绩。不过，这在日常办公中完全没有问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6623 Points +30%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6523 Points +28%Average of class Office (2823 - 7626, n=71, last 2 years)
6067 Points +19%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
5697 Points +12%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
5672 Points +11%Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5068 - 5600, n=11)
5315 Points +4%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
5103 Points PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10635 Points +8%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10440 Points +6%Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9828 - 11912, n=11)
10439 Points +6%Average of class Office (6567 - 11594, n=71, last 2 years)
10059 Points +2%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
9883 Points 0%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9873 Points 0%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
9864 Points PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9192 Points +37%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8530 Points +27%Average of class Office (3041 - 10925, n=71, last 2 years)
8343 Points +24%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7237 Points +7%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
7180 Points +7%Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6196 - 7261, n=11)
6847 Points +2%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
6733 Points PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8855 Points +63%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8299 Points +53%Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=71, last 2 years)
7345 Points +35%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
6982 Points +29%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
6521 Points +20%Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5361 - 6164, n=11)
5747 Points +6%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
5432 Points CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1876 Points +26%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1675 Points +13%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1654 Points +11%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1486 Points Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1339 - 1599, n=11)
1442 Points -3%Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=80, last 2 years)
1434 Points -3%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1423 Points -4%CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1829 Points +25%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1650 Points +13%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1625 Points +11%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1459 Points Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1337 - 1638, n=11)
1444 Points -1%Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=80, last 2 years)
1409 Points -3%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1400 Points -4%CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1917 Points +20%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1797 Points +12%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1727 Points +8%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1598 Points HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1549 Points -3%Average of class Office (319 - 2155, n=80, last 2 years)
1536 Points -4%Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1315 - 1620, n=11)
1493 Points -7%CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1899 Points +51%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1531 Points +22%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1421 Points +13%Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1023 - 1868, n=11)
1310 Points +4%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1259 Points Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=80, last 2 years)
1239 Points -2%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1161 Points -8%
PCMark 10 Score
5103 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69258 MB/s +21%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64187 MB/s +12%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
57084 MB/s Average of class Office (19927 - 108783, n=82, last 2 years)
56705 MB/s -1%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47829 MB/s -16%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (22417 - 60884, n=11)
47107 MB/s -17%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
34938 MB/s -39%AIDA64 / Memory Read
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63509 MB/s +3%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
61555 MB/s Average of class Office (10084 - 127282, n=82, last 2 years)
58048 MB/s -6%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
53949 MB/s -12%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (23104 - 61555, n=11)
43904 MB/s -29%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37476 MB/s -39%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
30289 MB/s -51%AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
85570 MB/s +38%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
83155 MB/s +34%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
62165 MB/s Average of class Office (20073 - 117935, n=82, last 2 years)
60070 MB/s -3%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (22936 - 72584, n=11)
53408 MB/s -14%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47179 MB/s -24%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
40169 MB/s -35%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
106.4 ns * -22%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M
102.6 ns * -18%Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=79, last 2 years)
98.5 ns * -13%Average Intel Core i5-1335U (78.6 - 112.8, n=11)
96.1 ns * -10%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
93 ns * -7%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92.7 ns * -6%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
87.3 ns * * ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网冲浪、播放 4K YouTube 视频和 CPU 负载）中，我们的测试装置显示出在使用实时音频应用时存在一些小限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
6070.1 μs * -359%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB
3084.9 μs * -133%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1321.3 μs * SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
868.4 μs * +34%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
697.4 μs * +47%* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案我们的测试设备配备了 512GB 版本的三星 PM9B1 固态硬盘。虽然这是一款同样通过 PCIe 4.0 连接的 PCIe 4.0 硬盘，但整体性能更接近 PCIe 3.0 水平，最大传输速率约为 3.5 GB/s。虽然理论上应该可以达到更高的传输速率，但实际上硬盘的速度还是足够快的。首次启动笔记本电脑后，用户仍可使用 415 GB 的存储空间。你可以在 我们的技术部分.
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMVCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3552 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2432 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
405 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
333 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
71.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
127.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
317 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
514 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMVSequential Read:
2991MB/s
Sequential Write:
1760MB/s
4K Read:
70MB/s
4K Write:
182.3MB/s
4K-64 Read:
655MB/s
4K-64 Write:
1111MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.029ms
Access Time Write:
0.033ms
Copy ISO:
1850.32MB/s
Copy Program:
622.68MB/s
Copy Game:
1310.94MB/s
Score Read:
1024Points
Score Write:
1470Points
Score Total:
2980Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMVDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
3615MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
2498MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
2597MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
1922MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
613MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
339MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
73.4MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
132MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
3601MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
92.7 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.3 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
69.4 pt HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.3 pt Average of class Office
53.7 pt HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
48.3 pt Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
46.3 pt DiskSpd
seq readSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3878 (3830.24min - 3878.26max) MB/s +49%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
3805 (3764.39min - 3804.92max) MB/s +47%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2989 (2968.66min - 2989.28max) MB/s +15%Average of class Office (121 - 4554, n=79, last 2 years)
2884 MB/s +11%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2597 (2578.95min - 2597.37max) MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2423 - 2597, n=4)
2489 MB/s -4%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
2089 (1958.25min - 2089.39max) MB/s -20% seq writeSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4000 (3970.36min - 3999.69max) MB/s +108%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
3939 (3670.65min - 3938.99max) MB/s +105%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
3772 (213.28min - 3772.36max) MB/s +96%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3566 (3496.37min - 3566.41max) MB/s +86%Average of class Office (43 - 5842, n=79, last 2 years)
2843 MB/s +48%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1922 (1823.35min - 1922.32max) MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1776 - 1965, n=4)
1904 MB/s -1% seq q8 t1 readLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
6922 (6439.1min - 6921.65max) MB/s +91%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6876 (6162.32min - 6876.44max) MB/s +90%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6683 (6134.38min - 6682.57max) MB/s +85%Average of class Office (124.2 - 7120, n=79, last 2 years)
5269 MB/s +46%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
4886 (4359.86min - 4886.36max) MB/s +35%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
3615 (3180.26min - 3615.49max) MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (3499 - 3615, n=4)
3556 MB/s -2% seq q8 t1 writeHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6037 (6002.26min - 6037.19max) MB/s +142%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
5146 (5040.52min - 5145.57max) MB/s +106%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4970 (4966.69min - 4970.17max) MB/s +99%Average of class Office (46.7 - 6791, n=79, last 2 years)
3977 MB/s +59%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
3881 (113.46min - 3881.41max) MB/s +55%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2498 (2182.09min - 2498.13max) MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2210 - 2498, n=4)
2388 MB/s -4% 4k q1 t1 readSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
88.6 (88.22min - 88.59max) MB/s +21%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
78 (75.26min - 78max) MB/s +6%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (64.9 - 79.7, n=4)
74.2 MB/s +1%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
73.4 (68.48min - 73.41max) MB/s HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
60.7 (60min - 60.68max) MB/s -17%Average of class Office (5.55 - 93.1, n=79, last 2 years)
57.6 MB/s -22%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
43.7 (23.85min - 43.65max) MB/s -40% 4k q1 t1 writeHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023
360 (353.95min - 359.55max) MB/s +173%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
224 (221.2min - 223.61max) MB/s +70%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
153.1 (149.35min - 153.09max) MB/s +16%Average of class Office (1.23 - 309, n=79, last 2 years)
151.4 MB/s +15%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
132.4 (130.43min - 132.37max) MB/s 0%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
132 (124.11min - 131.99max) MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (125.5 - 132, n=4)
128.6 MB/s -3% 4k q32 t16 readSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3484 (3457.82min - 3484.34max) MB/s +468%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
2252 (2223.45min - 2252.41max) MB/s +267%Average of class Office (7.49 - 3806, n=79, last 2 years)
1224 MB/s +100%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
981 (956.75min - 980.97max) MB/s +60%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
809 (733.52min - 808.86max) MB/s +32%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (476 - 1025, n=4)
695 MB/s +13%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
613 (598.14min - 612.58max) MB/s 4k q32 t16 writeSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2554 (2537.7min - 2554.39max) MB/s +653%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
1611 (217.51min - 1610.59max) MB/s +375%Average of class Office (1.5 - 3337, n=79, last 2 years)
836 MB/s +147%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
456 (447.45min - 455.69max) MB/s +35%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
432 (416.82min - 432.19max) MB/s +27%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (339 - 631, n=4)
421 MB/s +24%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
339 (337.49min - 339.1max) MB/s AS SSD
Score TotalSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8363 Points +181%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
6213 Points +108%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5918 Points +99%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
4700 Points +58%Average of class Office (799 - 8001, n=78, last 2 years)
4205 Points +41%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2783 - 3533, n=4)
3085 Points +4%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2980 Points Score ReadSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3090 Points +202%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
2872 Points +180%Average of class Office (383 - 3256, n=78, last 2 years)
1454 Points +42%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1419 Points +39%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
1394 Points +36%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1024 Points Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (791 - 1028, n=4)
921 Points -10% Score WriteHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3831 Points +161%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3765 Points +156%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
2686 Points +83%Average of class Office (247 - 3808, n=78, last 2 years)
2066 Points +41%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
1894 Points +29%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1470 - 2029, n=4)
1731 Points +18%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1470 Points Seq ReadLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
5347 MB/s +79%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5315 MB/s +78%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4270 MB/s +43%Average of class Office (925 - 5796, n=78, last 2 years)
3979 MB/s +33%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
3934 MB/s +32%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2991 MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2802 - 3018, n=4)
2904 MB/s -3% Seq WriteSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3766 MB/s +114%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
3205 MB/s +82%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
3097 MB/s +76%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2853 MB/s +62%Average of class Office (294 - 5207, n=78, last 2 years)
2584 MB/s +47%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1760 MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1521 - 1865, n=4)
1709 MB/s -3% 4K ReadHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023
96.2 MB/s +37%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
80.26 MB/s +15%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
71.5 MB/s +2%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
70 MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (51.2 - 72.4, n=4)
63.1 MB/s -10%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
59 MB/s -16%Average of class Office (18 - 88.2, n=78, last 2 years)
57.1 MB/s -18% 4K WriteLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
215 MB/s +18%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
192.61 MB/s +6%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
189.9 MB/s +4%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
182.3 MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (147.1 - 198.9, n=4)
181.5 MB/s 0%Average of class Office (28.2 - 245, n=78, last 2 years)
164.9 MB/s -10%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
152 MB/s -17% 4K-64 ReadSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2478.53 MB/s +278%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
2382 MB/s +264%Average of class Office (272 - 2643, n=78, last 2 years)
999 MB/s +53%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
933 MB/s +42%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
787 MB/s +20%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
655 MB/s Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (452 - 655, n=4)
568 MB/s -13% 4K-64 WriteHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3394 MB/s +205%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3195.52 MB/s +188%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
2161 MB/s +95%Average of class Office (183.4 - 3370, n=78, last 2 years)
1643 MB/s +48%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
1384 MB/s +25%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1111 - 1679, n=4)
1378 MB/s +24%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1111 MB/s Access Time ReadHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023
0.136 ms * -369%Average of class Office (0.025 - 0.302, n=77, last 2 years)
0.08239 ms * -184%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (0.029 - 0.098, n=4)
0.052 ms * -79%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.031 ms * -7%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
0.029 ms * Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.023 ms * +21%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +24% Access Time WriteAverage of class Office (0.016 - 0.625, n=78, last 2 years)
0.07023 ms * -113%Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (0.03 - 0.091, n=4)
0.04675 ms * -42%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EASamsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
0.033 ms * Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023
0.03 ms * +9%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EASK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.025 ms * +24%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiSamsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +33%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.017 ms * +48%* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA: Ø3601 (3020.57-3626.9)
图形卡图形由著名的 Iris Xe Graphics G7但与酷睿 i5 处理器配合使用时，这只是较慢的版本，只有 80 EUs。酷睿 i7 处理器配备的是速度更快的 iGPU 版本，有 96 个 EU。此时，Xe Graphics G7 已在市场上销售了一段时间，虽然其性能足以满足日常办公任务和播放高分辨率视频的需要，但整体性能很低。如果你想在下班后玩一些游戏，这一点也会很明显，因为这时你通常只能玩低度或中度细节的游戏。另一方面，当前要求较高的游戏则根本无法流畅运行。
在持续负载的情况下，图形性能并不稳定，大约会下降 10%。另一方面，在电池工作状态下性能保持稳定。您可以在这里找到其他 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
100 pt Average of class Office
44.2 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
39.7 pt HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
38.2 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
36.1 pt HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
31.1 pt Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
28.8 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
16904 Points +201%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
7868 Points +40%Average of class Office (1468 - 16418, n=75, last 2 years)
7827 Points +39%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
6752 Points +20%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
6238 Points +11%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
5616 Points Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2246 - 6579, n=111)
5195 Points -7%3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12349 Points +197%Average of class Office (736 - 10476, n=78, last 2 years)
5551 Points +34%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
5477 Points +32%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
5017 Points +21%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
4550 Points +10%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
4151 Points Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1560 - 5398, n=113)
3815 Points -8%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
4773 Points +279%Average of class Office (322 - 4415, n=75, last 2 years)
1976 Points +57%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
1656 Points +32%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1496 Points +19%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
1463 Points +16%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
1258 Points Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (561 - 1576, n=110)
1177 Points -6%
3DMark 11 Performance
5864 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
3695 points3DMark Time Spy Score
1407 pointsHelp... in comparison
Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Office (94 - 110, n=2, last 2 years)
102 Seconds * SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
53 Seconds * Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Office (155 - 175, n=2, last 2 years)
165 Seconds * SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
91 Seconds * Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
1020 Seconds * Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (463 - 3047, n=52)
919 Seconds * +10%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
700 Seconds * +31%Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=78, last 2 years)
658 Seconds * +35%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
537 Seconds * +47%SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
456 Seconds * +55%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
345 Seconds * +66%* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
100 pt Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
38.3 pt Average of class Office
36.8 pt HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
32.1 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
29.9 pt HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
26 pt The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44.2 (42min, 42P1) fps +302%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.4 fps +49%Average of class Office (3.8 - 32.5, n=33, last 2 years)
15.9 fps +45%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
14.3 (12min, 13P1) fps +30%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
12.1 (8min, 9P1) fps +10%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
11 (9min, 10P1) fps GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
67.5 (9.08min, 43.5P1) fps +673%Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=72, last 2 years)
15.5 fps +78%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
12.2 (4.27min, 8.4P1) fps +40%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
11.5 (6.52min, 7.87P1) fps +32%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
9.03 (3.93min, 6.62P1) fps +3%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
8.73 (4.4min, 5.32P1) fps Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
50.1 fps +263%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
21.8 fps +58%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
19 fps +38%Average of class Office (6.45 - 36.5, n=75, last 2 years)
19 fps +38%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
15.9 fps +15%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.8 fps Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
86 (52.1min, 63.8P1) fps +315%Average of class Office (12.8 - 61.7, n=58, last 2 years)
32.5 fps +57%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.7 (6.7min, 10.1P1) fps +39%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
25 (17.4min, 19.8P1) fps +21%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
22.2 (5min, 5.85P1) fps +7%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
20.7 (5min, 5.12P1) fps Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
109.1 (95.7min) fps +142%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59.6 (50.1min) fps +32%Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=81, last 2 years)
53.8 fps +19%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
51.5 (43.1min) fps +14%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
45.1 (38.5min) fps Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
34.8 (32.5min) fps -23%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
82.3 fps +300%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.8 fps +98%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30.6 fps +49%Average of class Office (10.9 - 92.6, n=73, last 2 years)
30.5 fps +48%HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M
28.2 fps +37%HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
20.6 fps
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø11 (9-13)
lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)
88.7
74.7
20
8.73
The Witcher 3 (2015)
73
47
25
11
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
110.3
71.5
49.1
45.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
32.4
18.4
13.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
36.8
28.4
20.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)
36
20
19
18
Strange Brigade (2018)
83.4
34.6
26.1
20.7
F1 2021 (2021)
73.1
42.9
32.5
23.2
F1 22 (2022)
35.3
33.4
25
F1 23 (2023)
29.4
28.2
19.9
排放 - 功率限制过高导致风扇噪音过大噪音水平带热管的单风扇EliteBook 使用单风扇，这对于 U 系列处理器来说确实完全够用。然而，短时间内超过 50 瓦的超高功率限制在这里也变得非常明显。两个高性能内核的时钟速度非常高，这也导致温度非常高。这也导致风扇即使在短时间的负载峰值时也会迅速打开，甚至在所有性能模式下都是如此。在极端情况下，这导致风扇噪音最大超过 40 dB(A)，考虑到性能，这实在是太高了。但由于性能下降很快，风扇噪音在压力测试期间也会降低，变化范围在 31 到 35 dB（A）之间。在日常操作过程中，风扇偶尔也会打开，例如当多个浏览器标签处于活动状态时。我们希望惠普能对性能模式进行更多优化，限制更高效模式下的功耗。 现在你能做的最多就是进行一些手动调整。我们的测试设备不会产生任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle
23.1 / 23.1 / 23.1 dB(A)Load
35.3 / 41.1 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A)
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMVHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EARadeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101NLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TBHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360PSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiGeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BWNoise-8%-11%-13%-16%off / environment * (dB)23.125.3 -10%24.8 -7%25.4 -10%24.4 -6%Idle Minimum * (dB)23.125.3 -10%24.8 -7%25.4 -10%24.4 -6%Idle Average * (dB)23.125.3 -10%24.8 -7%25.4 -10%24.4 -6%Idle Maximum * (dB)23.125.3 -10%28.5 -23%29.6 -28%27.8 -20%Load Average * (dB)35.334.4 3%39.6 -12%42 -19%43.3 -23%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)37.343.4 -16%42.7 -14%48.2 -29%Load Maximum * (dB)41.143.4 -6%42.7 -4%40.9 -0%48.8 -19%* ... smaller is better
温度表面温度始终没有问题。在空闲运行和低负载情况下，这款商务笔记本电脑几乎不会发热，即使在最大负载情况下，我们在底部后部中央区域测得的最高温度也只有 45 °C（113 °F）。因此，您可以始终将 EliteBook 放在膝上运行。
在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中，处理器的表现与纯 CPU 负载时相同。起初，功耗在短时间内迅速跃升至 50 瓦以上，但随后又迅速下降。几分钟后，功耗降至勉强超过 15 瓦的水平，之后一直保持在这一较低水平。
压力测试中的 CPU/iGPU 数据
Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
38.3 °C40.5 °C38.8 °C 38.2 °C38.9 °C33.7 °C 30.3 °C28.5 °C27 °C
Maximum: 40.5 °CAverage: 34.9 °C
38.7 °C45.8 °C42.2 °C29.2 °C43.1 °C39.2 °C28.6 °C30.8 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 45.8 °CAverage: 36.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 35.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
25.1 °C25.5 °C25.2 °C 25.1 °C25.4 °C25 °C 24.8 °C24.9 °C24.7 °C
Maximum: 25.5 °CAverage: 25.1 °C
25.7 °C25.7 °C25.6 °C24.9 °C26.1 °C26 °C24.9 °C25.5 °C25.7 °C
Maximum: 26.1 °CAverage: 25.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 25.8 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
37.9 °C40.3 °C39 °C 38.5 °C39.2 °C34.7 °C 30.9 °C28.7 °C27.4 °C
Maximum: 40.3 °CAverage: 35.2 °C
39.1 °C46.2 °C42.6 °C31.8 °C42.4 °C39.3 °C28.9 °C31.3 °C31 °C
Maximum: 46.2 °CAverage: 37 °C Power Supply (max.) 35.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.3 °C / -5.9 F).
应力测试期间的表面温度（顶部）
应力测试期间的表面温度（底部）
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAIntel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780MLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPUHeat-8%-1%-19%-17%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)40.545.6 -13%44.4 -10%46.5 -15%48.4 -20%Maximum Bottom * (°C)45.851.9 -13%45.3 1%44.7 2%57.1 -25%Idle Upper Side * (°C)25.526.5 -4%24.9 2%34.9 -37%28.1 -10%Idle Bottom * (°C)26.127 -3%25.7 2%32.9 -26%29 -11%* ... smaller is better
发言人音响系统由四个扬声器组成，也能产生不错的音效，尤其是对于办公笔记本电脑而言。然而，竞争对手如 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11等竞争对手，尤其是高品质的子笔记本电脑，如MateBook X Pro在这方面做得更好。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 高效的日常运行耗电量在空闲运行时，功耗值非常低，在显示屏亮度达到最大值时为 6.3 瓦。然而，在负载情况下，高功率限制开始变得明显。在压力测试中，65 瓦充电器甚至很快就达到了极限，但随后功耗很快就趋于平稳，约为 30 瓦。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.31 / 0.63 WattIdle 2.8 / 6.1 / 6.3 Watt
Load
48.9 / 65.9 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAi5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAR9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Tii7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Average of class Office Power Consumption-48%-3%-32%-100%-19%-21%Idle Minimum * (Watt)2.84.3 -54%3.9 -39%4.1 -46%7.5 -168%4.47 ?(2.3 - 15.8, n=107) -60%4.58 ?(1.5 - 13.8, n=83, last 2 years) -64%Idle Average * (Watt)6.110.1 -66%6.3 -3%6.6 -8%10.4 -70%7.37 ?(3.5 - 16.8, n=107) -21%7.46 ?(3 - 14.9, n=83, last 2 years) -22%Idle Maximum * (Watt)6.311.2 -78%6.9 -10%8 -27%11.4 -81%9.24 ?(4.5 - 17, n=107) -47%8.9 ?(4.4 - 18.6, n=83, last 2 years) -41%Load Average * (Watt)48.964.4 -32%41.8 15%61 -25%83.3 -70%36.6 ?(14.3 - 70, n=104) 25%41.5 ?(6.92 - 77.9, n=71, last 2 years) 15%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)38.259.4 -55%33.2 13%56 -47%92.7 -143%Load Maximum * (Watt)65.966.7 -1%63.4 4%90 -37%110.3 -67%61.7 ?(24.2 - 149, n=107) 6%62.1 ?(11.1 - 107, n=83, last 2 years) 6%* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø38.2 (33.8-51.2) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø35.1 (28.6-65.8) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.68 (3.79-7.61)
Power Consumption With External Monitor
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø30.8 (24.4-65.9) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø27.4 (22.5-35.6) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø36.8 (25.9-66) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø32.1 (30-40.7) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø33.1 (28.7-44.2) HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.66 (3.83-7.3)
电池寿命充电过程51 瓦时的电池可提供良好的电池续航时间，尽管一些竞争对手如 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11甚至超过了这一水平。在调整亮度为 150 cd/m²（相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的 70%）的情况下，我们的 WLAN 测试可持续近 10 个小时，在全亮度情况下可持续近 8 个小时。在视频测试中（亮度同样为 150 cd/m²），它甚至能持续近 13 个小时。在打开笔记本电脑的情况下，完全充电大约需要 2 小时，34 分钟后可达到 50% 的电量。如果选择选配的 WQHD 面板，电池续航时间会缩短，这一点在 EliteBook 845 G10.
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 115)
9h 47min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 115)
7h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 10min
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EAi5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 51 WhHP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EAR9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 51 WhLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 WhHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 WhSCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Tii7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 WhAverage of class Office Battery Runtime-35%6%-12%-5%5%H.264 (h)12.79.3 -27%14.1 11%8.8 -31%11.1 -13%14.2 ?(6.83 - 25, n=15, last 2 years) 12%WiFi v1.3 (h)9.87.9 -19%14 43%9.7 -1%10.1 3%11.7 ?(3.83 - 31.5, n=84, last 2 years) 19%Load (h)2.20.9 -59%1.4 -36%2.1 -5%2.1 -5%1.88 ?(0.933 - 3.63, n=40, last 2 years) -15%
Pros+ 高品质外壳
+ 非常好的输入设备
+ 良好的维护选项
+ 现代化连接
+ 集成 WWAN（4G 或 5G）
+ 500 万像素网络摄像头Cons- 显示屏亮度低于制造商规定的亮度
- 风扇开启过快
- 没有 SD 读卡器
评语 - 具有一些弱点的商务旗舰产品测试 HP EliteBook 1040 G10。测试机由 campuspoint.de 提供
EliteBook 1040 G10 是惠普商务系列中的佼佼者，但我们的测试机在实际使用中却无法胜任这一角色。首先，当前的酷睿 i5 处理器速度并不是特别快，但如果你决定购买这款机型，就已经知道了这一点。但令人费解的是，惠普为什么允许处理器在所有性能配置文件中消耗高达 52 瓦的功率。不过，在日常办公操作中，系统性能还是不错的。
机箱质量很高，输入设备也非常好。此外，还有很好的维护选项，还可选配用于移动互联网（4G 或 5G）的 WWAN 模块。不过，低功耗显示屏仍然与预期稍有差距，因为明显达不到宣传的亮度，而且在日常操作中明显感觉响应时间较慢。虽然可以为 EliteBook 845 G10 选配 500 尼特和 120 赫兹的 WQHD 面板 EliteBook 845 G10但根据数据表，1040 G10 并非如此。
惠普EliteBook 1040 G10拥有高品质的镁合金外壳、丰富的安全功能和现代化的连接。尽管价格不菲，但其他特性并不令人信服，总体而言，EliteBook 845 G10 是更好的选择。
在我们看来，EliteBook 1040 G10 最强劲的竞争对手是 EliteBook 845 G10。虽然它比 EliteBook 1040 G10 重 160 克（约 5.6 盎司），但它采用了速度更快的 AMD 处理器，还可选配更出色的显示屏。我们目前有一个较弱的版本，配备了 Ryzen 7 7840U和 400 尼特显示屏的较弱版本进行了测试，结果表明其功耗限制调整得更好，在 WLAN 测试中的运行时间延长了 2-3 个小时。在我们的测试中 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11在性能和电池续航时间方面也具有一定优势。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
价格和供应情况可定制的 EliteBook 1040 G10 可直接从惠普在线商店购买，起价 1250 美元。亚马逊上也有一些配置，如 WUXGA 版本的售价约为 1,740 美元。
HP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA
- 09/07/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis91 / 98 → 93%
Keyboard96%
Pointing Device92%
Connectivity70 / 80 → 88%
Weight71 / 20-75 → 93%
Battery88%
Display86%
Games Performance59 / 78 → 76%
Application Performance81 / 95 → 85%
Temperature89%
Noise84%
Audio73%
Camera51 / 85 → 60%
Average79%
88%
Office - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceHP EliteBook 1040 G10 818N7EA (EliteBook 1040 Series)
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 549 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 626404 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!